By Sr. Laura Coughlin
Next week I will be examined on the quality of the theological synthesis I will bring to the world from my education at Boston College.
Next week I will be examined on the quality of the theological synthesis I will bring to the world from my education at Boston College.
One of the exam’s practice questions captured my attention
in the way it tied the theological virtue of hope with Christ’s Resurrection,
and asked how we would speak of such lofty concepts to a person whose loved one
had died by an act of injustice.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3d3c6/3d3c6e15b408142c32997787a3e4ddf42b9acea1" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce61e/ce61ed8254b536fce24ad6f3b9881027c7f5bdbe" alt=""
* *
*
Hope is one of three theological virtues. Karl Rahner argues that hope flows directly
from the will of God, and unifies faith and love. All three virtues orient humankind toward an
ultimate future known already in the Resurrection of Christ. Anthropologically, hope is the acceptance of
an orientation toward God with which all men and women are made capable of
receiving Revelation. Rahner correlates
hope with courage suggesting that its expression willingly renounces what is “unnecessary
in the present” for what is promised in the absolute future by an “uncontrollable
and incalculable God."
How do we grasp such a renunciation when that which is
“unnecessary” is one’s own son? Clearly
Christ’s Resurrection indicates that human beings are not created to be
perishable, but to live a transfigured life eternally in union with God. What is “unnecessary”, therefore, is not the
person who dies, but the control we desire over how our lives will unfold in
relationship with others. Till’s person today
connects to millions of others who live an embodied existence, a fact easily
proved in any U.S. history class.
Through a concept developed by Louis-Marie Chauvet, his presence to us
now can be understood symbolically as the "presence of an absence." Somewhat controversially, Chauvet used this phrase
to explain how Christians throughout time experience the risen Christ.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eec79/eec79f1808af810585dca540a771974ae1ab1163" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ac451/ac45131da41f23404afe60bf3d2519fd75fffd2c" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7c7c1/7c7c1774954a9cdf45bc820d3de574c673599ed3" alt=""
“Emmett was not mine;
he (Emmett) belonged to him (God)…God had chosen him (Emmett) for this
mission.”
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/855e4/855e42151b6f1c31bd0c1340e8ebd14992cabe75" alt=""
Christian hope exerts itself for the coming of the Kingdom
of God, something which would be an impossibility without the Resurrection of
Christ. But the Resurrection itself is a
Trinitarian act, and indicates the importance God places on perfected relationships. Because Mamie Till believed that her own
relation to her son was held in the light of a larger relation to God, she knew
that the secular acquittal of injustice was not the last word. The first and last Word of God is raised in
the love of the Trinity, a love whose distinctions of divinity are nonetheless held
in absolute unity. This love affirms that
there is only one category of “race” that matters in the end. On this knowledge of God, Mamie Till placed
all her hope.
Sources
Rahner, Karl, On the
Theology of Hope, Theological Investigations, vol. 10, ch 13, 1968.
Chauvet, Louis-Marie, Symbol and Sacrament. 1995.
Chauvet, Louis-Marie, Symbol and Sacrament. 1995.
The Untold Story of
EMMETT LUIS TILL (Documentary 2005) by Keith Beauchamp, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bvijYSJtkQk
As always...AMAZING!
ReplyDelete