By Sr. Laura Coughlin
When it comes to the Lenten practice of “giving something
up”, I’ve been rather slack in the past.
It seems to me that if there is something I need to give up, I should do
it right now. But then, of course – who does that?
Saints do. And this
is a goad to my conscience.
How useful is it really to give up things like beer and
candy in a difficult season when a return to these goods is fully anticipated
at Lent’s conclusion? If the purpose is
conversion, and you have a problem with beer, shouldn’t you be giving up beer
for good?
The saints would say AMEN to that.
We misunderstand saints when we treat them as going too far
in fasting and other penances. The holy
ones know the wide gap between God and humankind because they have been gifted
with vision. They know that sacrifices
which seem outsized to the rest of us are only baby steps in the eyes of
God. And they set the example that wholehearted
baby steps are irresistible to an indulgent parent. Isn’t this why the Father runs toward his
beloved young man while still “a long way off”? (Lk 15:20).
But the prodigal son wasn’t a saint, so perhaps the parable
doesn’t work for the story I’m telling.
Then again, the holy ones consistently demonstrate a pattern of thought
from which they describe themselves as the most debased of all. A saint’s “who am I to judge?” comes not from
presumption that sin is not sin, but from the examined knowledge of concupiscence,
of one’s own inclinations to evil. Out
of this knowledge, they understand the need for mercy.
When I began this post, I intended to write about how Lenten
sacrifices better enable us to look at God directly. Beer and candy and television and Downton
Abbey (NO, BRITISH ANGLICANS ARE MUCH TOO ENTERTAINING TO BE FASTED FROM!) and
Facebook and Donald Trump and checking email every two minutes and and Youtube
videos and the ubiquitous cache of itunes on the ubiquitous iPhone
entertainment system can be distractions that deprive believers of the one who
offered himself as the humble, but glorious, mediation of divine mercy.
So….I gave up useless internet surfing.
A small thing? Nay, a
deficient and persistent habit of the mind that translates curiosity into what
T.S. Eliot described as “knowledge of motion but not of stillness.”
What do I mean more precisely? How much energy is expended researching the
ideal pew for people with back pain, or trying to find out whether standing
over sitting offers significant weight loss benefits, or watching YouTube
videos of Rebekah, “Coonrippy” Brown’s seized pet raccoon, or being pulled off
track by every tiny idol of “long skirt” because I googled one back in November?
So straighten up you
backslider! Purify your heart, ye double
minded! It would seem that to be a fisher of persons I must remove the slack
in my fishing line.
Imagine the young man dragging himself home toward his
father. He’s sweating, he stinks, he’s
badly sunburnt, and his shoes – if he has any – are full of holes. He cannot stride quickly with such contemptible
footwear and so much hunger, but he has only one goal on his mind, and this he
pairs with a formidable determination. He
will not stop until he gains the security of living again in the Father’s
household. To be in that household is to
enjoy warmth, encouragement, companionship, nourishment, rest, work, a sense of
purpose, and the certainty that comes with belonging. So secure was that home that the weary son imagines
slavery there to be better than “freedom” elsewhere. Driven by necessity more than by the type of
freedom we often imagine as an ideal condition, he decides that what he has is
enough – it is, finally, enough to simply return to the household where he was
always loved without condition.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thanks for your comment! Once our admin it approves it, you will see it posted.